Majority Leader Steny Hoyer predicts the House will pass historic health care overhaul legislation Saturday to extend coverage to tens of millions of uninsured Americans.
Majority Leader Steny Hoyer predicts the House will pass historic health care overhaul legislation Saturday to extend coverage to tens of millions of uninsured Americans.
I'm at the point where I'd like to see our country divided into two nations: the conservatives, Republicans, Rush Limbaugh-Glenn Beck lovers, Sarah Palins and Joe Wilsons, religious zealots, etc. given the southern states where most of them reside anyway--and the rest of us given the northern states where most of us reside. Everyone would be happier.
I will take everything west of the Ohio Valley okay?
you'd be broke in a month and we'd have to bail you out.
Did you forget that Montana voted Republican at the last election? I think we're in the north.
Oregon Steve: how about this for the division?
Professor Joseph Olson of Hamline University School of Law, St. Paul, Minnesota , points out some interesting facts concerning the Presidential election:
Number of States won by: Democrats: 19; Republicans: 29
Square miles of land won by: Democrats: 580,000; Republicans: 2,427,000
Population of counties won by: Democrats: 127 million; Republicans: 143 million
Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by: Democrats: 13.2; Republicans: 2.1
Professor Olson adds: "In aggregate, the map of the territory Republican won was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of the country. Democrat territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in government-owned tenements and living off various forms of government welfare..."
you can keep all the land that the Democrat territory encompassed.
“You cannot legislate the poor into freedom by legislating the wealthy out of freedom. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that, my dear friend, is about the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it.”
--Dr. Adrian Rogers
"It is true that democracy undermines freedom when voters believe they can live off of others' productivity, when they modify the commandment: "Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote." The politics of plunder is no doubt destructive of both morality and the division of labor." – Gary North
I am not big on pain and violence I will stick with the Repubs
Oregon Steve, why don't you just move south to California? You would be in heaven with the rest of the liberals. We could probably put all of liberals in one quarter of the country. You are a minority.
Reading this stuff is kinda like when I was a kid watching the Soupy Sales show on Saturday morning - lots of laughs!
I love that David Boehner is touting the constitution as he rails against this bill. The man is from the same party as Bush who totlally ignored our constitution for 8 years. The GOP cares nothing about this country.
totally ignored our constitution for 8 years? What a kool aid drinker.
Uh, its John Boehner and this IS unConstitutional. Tell me how Bush was unconstitutional. What would you care anyway? obama said"I believe the United States Constitution to be a flawed document." You could care less about the validity and honoring of the Constitution and you know it. You are typical of the convenient perverters of reletive truths in order to achieve immediate gratification. That is the pathological nature of socialist liberals. Facts dont concern you, logic and truth are mere annoyances to dismiss or ignore and you run after every feel good faux solution that is trotted out to you with no accountability.
I like your post - you're one intelligent woman!
Brucie boy, you are a LUNATIC.
Considering the size of this bill, I honestly doubt anybody posting here on either side of the political aisle has ready any of it. At the same time many who have commented here have voiced some pretty strong opinions that would lead me to believe they have read it.
What I find really depressing is that I am sure both sides are lying to us and so they have us so confused we don't know who to trust anymore.
I do know that the insurance companies don't care about anything but their shareholders and annual profit margins. So they instinctively will hate and fight against anything that is designed to help us because it hurts their profits.
I actually read portions of the Affordable Health Care for America Act (H.R. 3962) which is the final, merged version of the health care reform legislation that the House has been working on for much of 2009.
The bill contains a moderate compromise on the public option by requiring the HHS Secretary to negotiate provider reimbursement rates rather than having them tied to Medicare. The bill also would require all individuals to have insurance, establish a new health insurance exchange, require most employers to provide insurance and ban insurance companies from denying coverage because of pre-existing conditions.
I believe this bill allows you to keep the insurance you have if you wish and in most cases those of us who are employed will keep what we have. The only difference is that there would be protections in place to safeguard our access and hopefully the cost to healthcare. I'm for this in principal.
The bill also makes numerous references to "shared responsibility" which to me really gets to the root of the problem. As Americans we each have to take responsibility for our health and not pin our visits to the ER on everyone else because we can't or won't get ourselves insured. The insurance companies have a responsibility to long time customers who have paid into their coffers over a lifetime. And Government has to take responsibility since the current annual costs of healthcare are so out of control they are literally eating up our budget.
Allowing the healthcare industry to self regulate has created a scenario where we pay too much and receive too little.
My God - finally someone who has read the bill - thank you - you have made my day - if you like the bill good - if not that's good too - all I care is someone here besides me read the bill as opposed to making things up about it - again thank you so very much.
I have not read it and will ask, why bother? It is far from the final form it will take. One thing that gets talked about all the time is the "if you like what you have you can keep it". But at the same time they are saying that your insurance company that you are dealing with now will be forced to cover anyone with any kind of condition. This will put insurance companies out of business if they are forced to cover pre-existing conditions. We all saw what happened to banks when ACORN protested them and forced them to make loans to people who were not capable of paying them back. What is to stop an organization like ACORN to start rounding up cancer patients and forcing one particular insurance company to cover 100's of them. It will drive that company out of business. What if that was your company? It may sound far fetched but it could happen. If the government is going to compete with private insurance than they should be required to take all of the people with serious pre-existing conditions. After all they are going to be operating with our tax dollars.
My honest feelings are they should kill the bill. Start over with bi-partisan support. I don't want to live with Harry and Nancy making the rules.
If you don't read any of it then frankly who should listen to you since you're not up on the material? I don't buy the rationale that the insurance companies will go out of business by doing the right thing. Many of them have seen record profits in the past 20 years. All we are asking is for them to pay out of the pot after we all have paid into it. Further, if you are saying they can't make a profit by honoring a system where they collect and payout in a fair manner, then perhaps the health insurance model does not belong in the private sector? Perhaps the government should kick in when certain pre-existing conditions break the business model for the industry. But I think this has yet to be determined.
Beyond that, for everyone who has uncertain feelings about the Dems, I have to say I consider Boehner and Joe "You Lie" Wilson to be just as creepy and untrustworthy.
Under 15% is record profits? Why bother reading anything at this point? Can you argue with me about the statement " if you like what you have you can keep it"?
I don't know where you are getting your numbers from. You should provide a source before you just go throwing numbers out there. "under 15%" may reflect what all industry categories have been going through considering the economy. What I do know is that Fortune 500's ranking in 2008 of America's most profitable industries ranked pharma at #3, medical products/equipment at #4 and health insurance (yes health insurance) at #9. So yes, even after these new laws come into play most people who like the plans they have will likely be able to keep them.
AR,
Apparently this congressman isn't aware of Medicare!
Tax, Spend, Socialize, and blame Bush
This is not just about health care, it' about this government having more control over us americans. I don't care if your a rep. or a dem. if they vote for this bill, I will vote to put them out of office
Vote for term limits.
We don't have to worry where the money is coming from to support this healthcare bill. We will be taxed accordingly. We can even work and all our money can be withheld by the government. The government can supply us food, gas, etc. based on our needs. There would be nothing to worry about as far as banking and taxes is concerned.
I don't plan on taking the mark.
Some of you people are paranoid, and other just downright ignorant, spouting off about topics of which you know nothing. I am an American Citizen who has lived both in the United States and in Canada (home of dreaded socialized medicine). I have received excellent health care in both countries.
In the United States, over the course of my career, I was a senior executive with two major international companies, and believe me, my medical plan was gold-plated. As a retiree now living in my childhood town in Canada, my medical plan is also gold-plated.
In the United States, I had three bouts of melanoma with associated treatment. My total cost, a $10 co-pay each time I went to the doctor. I also had knee surgery again with my total out-of-pocket a $10 co-pay for doctors visits.
In Canada, my wife was diagnosed with breast cancer about 18 months ago. She had surgery, 16 weeks of chemo, and 29 radiation treatments. I never saw any kind of bill, so I do not know what any of this cost. (I was told by the hospital pharmacist that one drug, administered 24 hours after each chemo treatment to stabilize WBC cost about $2,500 per shot and my wife had eight of them.) By contrast, a friend of ours from Ohio, who has moved to Houston, was prescribed a new medication by his doctor for cancer, and his insurance company refused to pay for it.
My wife has a wonderful oncologist, and any test the doctor has booked has been done with no questions asked, in a very timely fashion. Virtually every type of scan currently invented, including bone scans, CT scans, MRI, and even bone marrow testing and ultrasound testing has been done, and I am delighted to say all have come back clear. I have a friend who is a director on a hospital board in Michigan, and he says a breast cancer experience like my wife’s, can cost anywhere between $300K and $1million. Our out-of-pocket cost was $2.50 for parking in the hospital parking lot every visit.
Having been treated in both countries, I have done a bit of research into the two systems. Medical costs in the US are at least 15% higher than in Canada, just for the paperwork, with a multiplicity of forms needed for various insurance companies in the US, versus a single payer in Canada.
The public system in Canada, does not have an overseeing board, or cost reduction specialists who decide whether or not to allow someone to have a particular treatment or specific medication. Our doctor or specialist decides what we need and the single payer system covers the cost. Canada also does not have a private web of insurance companies bent on making a profit. If a Met Life or Blue Cross/Blue Shield makes a profit, which they do quite handsomely, that is just additional cost over what the real medical care costs. I think these types of companies should be forced out of business through competition from a public plan, thus stopping the leaches from sucking money from employers or individuals who pay their premiums.
I simply cannot understand the fuss in the United States over this issue. Why any sane individual would lobby for an unnecessary layer of cost, staffed by people who may refuse you the treatment your doctor says you need, in order to put profits into the hands of shareholders and into the pockets of overpaid executives, while still leaving 45 million or so Americans with absolutely no coverage, is beyond me.
Here is your Canadian Healthcare system.....you can keep it.
You may have had a good experience, but let me ask you why do people come to the US for treatment that they can't get quickly enough up there? I like my current plan and I don't want the government telling me when and what I can and can't have. With our ecomony the way it is these days, this is not the time to expariment with overhauling our entire health care system. We need to be addressing jobs and employment and perhaps we could look at health care reform later once we get our economy straightened out. I think what concerns most of us is that our current administration is pushing too fast too hard and not taking the time to do this thing right. That's the worst part of this discussion for me. We need more time.
Kvothe, I suppose you also have a youtube clip proving the earth is flat and that the sun revolves around the earth. You can find any kind of crap on the internet you want to prove some harebrained theory. Most of the content of the link you sent me is absolute rubbish. But then truth is often not sexy enough or does not drive ratings as well as flat out lies, so take what works.
Search a little and you can find similar horror stories coming out the American system, with people dying on the floors of ER waiting rooms after being ignored by staff for 24--36 hours, or ambulances being turned away from hospitals because the ERs are full. You will find people with the wrong surgery performed, or surgery on the wrong leg or arm, or poisoned by being given incorrect medication or an incorrect dose, or babies being sent home with the wrong family, or even stored embryos being implanted into the wrong mother.
You can also find doctors indiscriminately prescribing very expensive (and unnecessary) tests, because they are part owners of the lab that will do the work.
Like Bill Clinton’s analogy of what you find when you drag $20 through a trailer park, if you wave enough money under the nose of someone with a grudge against any government or medical system, that person will say just about anything on your script.
There is also a difference in Canadians that Americans will never understand. Canadians look out for each other; Americans look out for number one!! This past February I had a detached retina. It was diagnosed by an ophthalmologist in a morning, and by mid-afternoon I had emergency surgery to correct it. I now have a cataract that needs removing. I have agreed on a surgery date a month out. It is not impeding my vision that much, and is not going to cause further damage in one month, so I am waiting. Meanwhile someone who needs immediate, emergency treatment may be having it today, just as I needed it, because I am not shouting and pushing my way to the front of the line.
Jennie60, people go both ways across the US-Canada border. Loma Linda University Medical Center in California has a shared relationship with The Children’s Hospital of Western Ontario, in London Ontario. This Canadian hospital is a world leader in health care for children, especially critical surgery for newborns. Loma Linda often flies a seriously ill infant, perhaps needing a heart or lung transplant (or both) for the surgery to be performed in London. On the flip side, often Canadian children are sent to Loma Linda for some specialized treatment.
Some surgeries, such as stomach banding or stapling is done in US hospitals which do many more of these types of surgeries, and are better equipped to do them. However, note that when the doctor here recommends the surgery, and the patient is transferred to the US, the single-payer government health care system in Canada pays for the transportation and the surgery.
Thank you Herbie2 for taking the time to post on this very important issue. I appreciate it.
For this WH to come out and say there are NO alternatives being offered is a blatent LIE! People are NOT losing their health care right and left. Yes it is a problem, but we can NOT allow passage of ANY bill being put forth by people who find it so easy to LIE to the American Public. We aren't stupid, just conservative. I realize that in your world they're the same thing, but you might want to look at what's happening.
There ARE alternatives - YOU are the ONES REFUSING TO LOOK AT THEM. IT's YOUR way or NO way and we're the bad guys?! Really?!! That's what you want America to believe. READ THE BILLS YOU PASS... Since the Patriot Act, you people have acted with reckless abandon and disregard for this Country and it's citizens. It's time to END that. DON'T YOU DARE SHOVE THIS DOWN MY THROAT!
This crowd says we have no money for this however they are amazed that anyone would "dither" when thinking about sending our men and women to die in the Middle East.
Where would that money come from? Do they not worry about the source of funds if it's about war? Is is only domestic programs that they worry about funding?
Transparent crowd.
Michell Bachman has that money coming out of Medicare and Social Security in her latest bill.
welfare queen
Pelosi, Reid, and all the liberal left wacko's need to go now! They are doing whatever the heck they want.
Let me get this straight.
We're going to pass a health care plan
written by a committee whose head says he doesn't understand it,
passed by a Congress that hasn't read it but exempts themselves from it, signed by a president that also hasn't read it, and who smokes, with funding administered by a treasury chief who didn't pay his taxes, overseen by a surgeon general who is obese, and
financed by a country that's broke.
What possibly could go wrong?
good post!
Thanks! I thought it was funny, sad, and unfortunately true!
The constitution is being trampled, we need to do spmehting before it is too late.
It is already too late. When FDR created Medicare, the socialist nanny state was born!
you like it that way-you can suck nanny's breast dry.
You got me there, I do like sucking titty.
You know a lot of you people really sound like you're hired to post. I'm sure there are lots of folks on this story who are genuine but I don't think all are.
I mean you don't even take the time to comment or ask questions of the Canadian that posted above.
Stop complaining about the health care bill that the majority of americans are in favor of. How about turning of fox news and try thinking for your selves for a change.
How about this congress putting more effort into jobs and job creation. No one will be able to pay for "affordable health care" if they don't have a job. I do not believe that the majority of americans are in favor of it. If so, why weren't they out there today protesting for it? Makes you think doesn't it?
That's a lie -check Rasmussen poll--and you need to turn on Fox news.
1990 unvetted pages. Congress can barely write a bill of 2 pages that is clear and unambiguous. Wait till we lawyers get a hold of the words in the statute.
A bill of this magnitude (not passing judgment on the intent) necessarily requires months of legislative hearings and scrutiny so all affected parties can clarify the language.
Even after all of that time, I, for one, expect to be impressed, as usual, with the ambiguity, imprecision, conflicting, and just plan unconstitutionality of that which Congress passes.
It is almost a certainty that in 1990 pages there will be plenty of room for litigation. I already can see the billable hours mounting up :-)
one thing for sure it states....Congress will not be responsible for any problems this creates and cannot be sued in the future.
It isn't as if everyone starts from scratch on a new bill. Committees and staffs (from both Parties) have been developing the bills all along. Might want to let staff do a quick and thorough "read" to make sure the bill supporters haven't slipped something in and question changes.
Shouldn't require months of review.
You sound reasonably intelligence...haven't you ever had a course in Government 101?
It's a free country...they have every right to protest...whether they know anything or not. Just remember, it is also a big country and with the right backing and money, you could probably turn out 100,000 people in Washington in support of the Flat Earth Society.
Is that some kind of shot at Chrisitanity?
do you belong to the F.E.S.?
No George...I think the Church eventually got around to accepting Copernicus. Well...maybe not the Southern Baptists?
Sounds more like a shot at stupidity. Funny as hell though..
This just shows me that our elected representatives are not listening or working for us. This drive to push bad bills down our throats is sickening. I wrote my representative, but it doesn't matter he will vote for it anyway. It's time to vote all of those that vote for this will out once and for all. AARP supporting this bill just goes to show how corrupt they are. They will sell out their members for whatever it is they are going to get out of this. The issue should be jobs not Health Care with our ecomony the way it is. It's a sad day.
Amen! They should be ashamed of themselves for supporting commie programs like Medicare and Social Security!
you're right about that!
Seniors or over 65 are not the only ones on Medicare/Medicaid, There are many young adults and middle aged adults with serious medical issues, genetic and rare diseases! I'm one of them, Cystic Fibrosis DNA diagnosed age 50, disability age 52. I was a surgical trauma nurse, my symptoms emerged in the past few years and then was confirmed. You all have pre existing diagnosis! All of you, including the Rep party. I think the American people should stop paying for both parties healthcare!
There are not users of the system, while some illnesses may not be evident to you, it is a long and difficult process to gain SSDI and still wait 2 more years to become Medicare eligible. It's not that easy. I could DIE waiting for Medicare, but in the meantime, I pay for COBRA and I am still waiting for the subsidy to be extended and this applies to people with future job losses. You will need insurance for your families if not yourself. COBRA is expensive and worse is the State High Risk Pool.
Now, my younger brother has been diagnosed with bladder cancer, he has a family and could very well need COBRA< STD, LTD and the wait for Social Security DI and the longer wait for Medicare! I need him for my CF, which is RARE in adults, except for all of you with recurrent sinus/chest infections that are mistreated and undiagnosed so the docs keep you coming back and you stay sick, then you die of "Pneumonia", so sad, I don't know what happened to them. YOU have crappy docs, that's what!
IF only John Boehner (R-Ohio) Minority speaker, had to see my docs for care, then maybe the Republicans would understand healthcare!
The Rep Healthcare Overhaul bill DOES NOT cover PRE Existing conditions. they say lower costs, but it will be more frequent visits/costs and those stupid health savings accounts unused go to the insurance companies if certain conditions aren't meant. The Rep overhaul bill is the wrong medicine, the wrong dose!They know it , too.
Shame on them. The Rep party will not be known as the Good Samaritans of health insurance!
Ex Trauma Nurse 2/2 unpredicatable , incurable illness.
Maybe these diseases are god's way of thinning the herd. Kind of like the gays and AIDS. If you are that sick, its probably a sign you should let go.
wish you were sick.
He is...
Hey Sunnytoo - all my best wishes in respect to your current health situation and the challenges you are facing.
Orwell - your comment is as offensive as your lack of empathy. Good luck with that...
May you and your family have God's speed.
I hope this bill passses. It's the only way a revolution will start. Otherwise, we will just keep sitting on our asses and posting on the internet.
I just realize there are a lot of stupid f$^kin people out there and voted for a guy that wrote a speech or read one. How f*#kin gullable are you people. I wonder if the Repubs introduced this, then all you zeros out there would be changing your damn tune.
Amen FLU! Meet me over at FreedomWorks. We are planning the revolution as we speak!
Revolution...interesting?
Maybe the problem is that the PEOPLE do not know what they want.
They like their Medicare, but they don't want government run healthcare. Americans love choices, but they don't want a public option. There are 100 different polls that will tell anyone that their arguement is shared by the majority of people. What people??
Bottom line is this country is to diverse to come to a real majority on an issue such as healthcare. Elderly people have nothing in common with recent college grads. Parents have nothing in common with single people. Rich and poor, fat and skinny, we are all just too different.
That doesn't mean we shouldn't try - but politians need to realize that will not win a real majority of the country no matter what they do. And the people need to realize they won't get everything they want either.
You sound like you have been listening to Bill Maher. I think it was him who said you can't get 60% of the people to agree on anything, so what you have to do is drag them along whether they like it or not. No wonder the Obama supporters all love Mao Tse-Tung so much. They admire the way Mao killed 40 million people who did not want to go along with the program.
So what's the solution then Benny Boy? You going to make everyone happy somehow? What's the Republicans grand plan here, other than to scare the crap out of everyone?
when you go to the hospital and you have blue cross they personally see to it that you get good care but keep cost at a minimum by not overstaying in the hospital and by no unnecessary procedures. these people are experts at this with years of experience. when its the government paying nobody is going to give a rip until the whole system collapses.
keep cost at a minimum by not overstaying in the hospital and by no unnecessary procedures.
And sending you home early with tubes sticking out and draining....you know, to keep "costs" down.
I'm old enough to join the AARP. I would'nt join it before because they're just a marketing co. but I sure as hell will never even give them a thought ever again. WHORES
I seriously doubt that 99% of these people know what or why they're protesting against.
I attended three town hall meetings this summer and asked protesters were they willing to give up their Medicare. The answer was uniformly and emphatically "No' and guess what? Most of them didn't know Medicare was a "socialistic government program".
Interesting comment. So you admit that this bill is socialism? I assume you are saying that it's just more socialism, what's the big deal, right? lol. You're more confused the the old folks (who, by the way, did a lot more to keep America free than you ever will).
I don't believe you. People aren't willing to give up their Medicare because they have been forced to pay for it throughout their working lives. They were given no choice.
Compass
The more I look at your comment, the more stupid it becomes. The people on medicare paid into a system for years in order to insure that the elderly weren't left out in the cold, which has happened throughout history. Those funds, like SS, were meant to go into an "untouchable" fund. The democrats screwed that up. There's a big difference between folks letting the government save for their medical needs in old age and your description of medicare as socialism. Your analogy is much more than just comparing apples and oranges, it's downright stupid.
Compass,
You are a perfect example of the reason why peopple like Obama get elected to office. You beleive everything the crooks tell you and you really don't know any facts because that would take time and effort to educate yourself. It's obvious the statements you make were taken right out of a CNN report or other liberal paper. Educate your self so you don't look so ignorant. No disrespect intended.
Locally my health plan doesn't give permission for procedures for cancer if they can classify them as "experimental". Whether I live or die is based on their bottom line. they delay surgery for cateracts, I don't know how many of my coworkers have died before their time, because of inadequate testing, brain tumors, cancer,. We can't go to court against a HMO health plan. Canadians live 3 years longer than us. Ever look at Federal workers and their teeth, we talk about dental care in England, but start looking at middle class workers and see that already we can't all afford dental. So many people lose their homes in the last years of their life to pay medical bills, it doesn't happen to that extent in other industrialized nations. When was our medical care sold out to a companies profit margin and bottom lines. We've all known for years prescription prices are higher here than any other country, then they blocked us from going to Canada to fill prescriptions. I would like a choice of a new plan.
Well you dildo, the new plan ain't going to be giving you anything. The new plan will wind up costing more and they won't be giving out any better care than you already have. And don't snivel. I live in Bremerton and I know what plans are available out here.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |